Virtual Particle Energy

This is a post about Virtual Particle Energy.

Definition: Virtual Particles are particle and anti particle pairs that pop up out of the vacuum of space and annihilate into energy.

The commonly accepted idea is that this annihilation energy returns to the vacuum from where it came. BUT
What if it stays in the universe?

Concepts such as Conservation of energy, the expansion of the Universe due to Dark Energy, the Casimir effect, and Hawking radiation, all have scientific support. But they also seem to be in conflict.

My suggestion is that when virtual particle pairs pop up out of the vacuum of space, and annihilate, the energy STAYS in the universe.

This energy from virtual particle annihilation, builds up and expands the universe.
This may be the cause of Dark Energy.

This would mean that the energy from virtual particle annihilation does the following:

Suggests a reason for dark energy that is expanding the universe.
Suggests the energy resulting from both the Casimir effect and Hawking radiation, remains in the universe.
Suggests that conservation of energy does not apply on the entire universe.

Further this annihilation process should produce some very tiny boson of massless energy that has no charge and travels the speed of light. Stay tuned for more.

Deuterium and Helium

The top diagram shows Deuterium, with one proton, one neutron, and one electron. The neutron is itself a composite of one proton and one electron The bottom diagram shows Helium made up of two Deuteriums.
This supports why Helium is so stable.

Candles

Neutron and Hydrogen Atom, Different Versions

Neutron and Hydrogen Atom are Different Versions of the Same Thing. OR …Covalent bond between two hydrogen atoms is almost identical to a bond between a proton and neutron.

First compare (see drawing.)
Top: TWO protons and TWO electrons (two hydrogen atoms).
Bottom: TWO protons and ONE electron. ( one proton and one neutron)

BACKGROUND of my Model.
(See other posts for details about quarks, masses, forces, etc.)

Proton is two positrons (e+) and one electron (e-)
Neutron is two positrons (e+) and two electrons (e-).

Proton is e+, e+, e- , or charge Plus one.
Neutron is e+, e+, e-, e- ,or charge Zero.
Neutron is proton + electron.

Covalent bond: We know that two hydrogen atoms (each made up of one proton and one electron) can share their electrons in a covalent bond. Further, both electrons in a covalent bond, spend most of their time between the two protons, between the two nuclei. There spin must be opposite. See top illustration.

Suggestion that in my virtually identical model a proton and a neutron, (where the neutron is itself made of a proton plus electron) can bond in the same way. Yet in my model, there is a difference. There is only one electron instead of two. That electron, like the covalent bond example, should spend most of it’s time between the two protons! So in the bottom illustration the single electron from the neutron is mostly situated between the two protons.
See bottom illustration.

Further we can now distinguish between a hydrogen atom and a neutron. The hydrogen atom has a single proton with an electron around it. The neutron, when connected to a proton, will have it’s electron caught between the two protons. When a neutron is free, it decays to a proton and electron in 10-15 minutes.

So the difference between a hydrogen atom and a neutron is this: The hydrogen atom has a single electron circling it, while the neutron is a proton with a single electron circling it, but it can only exist when bonded to a proton. When it is by itself it breaks down into a proton and electron.

This suggests these discoveries:
Hydrogen atom, and Neutron have the exact same makeup of one proton and one electron. The placement of the electron makes the difference.
The missing anti matter is in protons and neutrons.
The reason why the charge of a massive proton and tiny electron are exactly the same.
The reason why a neutron and proton bond, (deuteron) and why that is such a key aspect of the makeup of all atom nuclei.

Pitch Correction and Auto tune, the Corporate Standard

Suit yourself, i say. Musicians do what you like. You should know by now that I hate it. But how about others, are they buying it?
Auto-Tune was originally intended to disguise or correct off-key inaccuracies, allowing vocal tracks to be perfectly tuned. The 1998 Cher song “Believe” popularized the technique of using Auto-Tune to distort vocals, Wikipedia

Since 1998, autotune and later pitch correction have become the corporate standard. So are people buying new recordings? NO
Sales since 1998 high, have tanked!

U.S. Recorded Music Industry Annual Revenue, Selected Years Between 1988 and 2023

1998 – $25.6 billion

2003 – $19.6 billion

2008 – $12.4 billion

2013 – $9.2 billion

2018 – $11.8 billion

2023 – $17.1 billion

All sums are adjusted for inflation in 2023 dollars and reflect the RIAA’s estimated retail value calculations. Source: RIAA

U.S. Recorded Music Revenues Are Still 46% Below 1999 Peaks, RIAA Data Shows